Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Port Wings-July-20-2016

Greetings from Port Wings Maritime Exim Weekly Newspaper (http://www.portwings.in/), Chennai, India
For latest Port Wings Maritime Exim Weekly's E-paper, visit http://www.portwings.in/e-paper/pw-july-20-2016/








Thanks & Regards,
Port Wings Maritime  Exim Weekly Newspaper 
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

For News: mail us at editorial@portwings.in and saravanan@portwings.in
For ADVT & Subscription queries: mail us at marketing@portwings.in
Follow Us on Twitter: @portwings 
Like Us in Facebook: Port-Wings-Maritime-Weekly


Thursday, June 30, 2016

Port Wings-June-29-Issue

Please Visit http://www.portwings.in/e-paper/pw-june-29-2016/ 









Thursday, February 4, 2016

Port Wings Maritime Weekly, February 03, 2016 Issue


Visit http://www.portwings.in/e-paper/pw-feb-03-2016/ for Port Wings Maritime Exim Weekly Newspaper's latest Issue








DP World’s Mistake: APM Terminals Denies any role, Blames Maersk Line


Source: http://www.portwings.in/shipping/dp-worlds-mistake-apm-terminals-denies-any-role-blames-maersk-line/

Chennai:
Port Wings News Network:
Reacting to Port Wings news article titled “DP World Chennai’s Costly Mistake Puts Importer in Trouble,” APM Terminals has clarified that APM Terminals’ Chennai CFS have no any role in the whole issue.
In a media statement, APM Terminals Inland Services South Asia stated that it played no role in assigning the delivery destination of the container in question and just followed normal procedure to move the container from port to the CFS facility based on instruction received from the shipping line.
“This was done in compliance to notice 45/2007 given by the Indian Customs. The Customs has to approve the move before the box can be moved. APM Terminals Inland Services, South Asia is not privy to any communication between customer and port or shipping line. The customer has the right to choose the CFS facility the container can go to,” the clarification statement added.

MAERSK LINE INSTRUCTED TO MOVE THE BOX TO CFS

In the same statement, APM Terminals stated that the reefer box was moved to its CFS located on the outskirts of Chennai from the DP World Chennai Container Terminal (CCTL) on the instruction from Maersk Line, the shipping line that brought in the container for the importer Balaji Flowers of Nilgiris.

MAERSK LINE’S EMAIL TO IMPORTER

According to the importer, based on his request to not to move the said container to any CFS, Maesrk Line’s representative using the email id (in.import@maersk.com) on Dec 18 (at 16:24 hrs) replied that the terminal (CCTL) has been instructed to hold the container.
“Dear Customer, with reference to the below (request), terminal (CCTL) is already instructed to hold container at port. Please pay SSR charges and confirm in order to post ESSR,” read the email reply sent to the importer from Maersk Line.
MYSTERY REMAINS UNSOLVED
While the Maersk Line confirmed to the importer about holding the container at the CCTL (DP World Chennai), it remains a mystery whether the same instruction has been shared with the terminal CCTL to hold the container at the port.
The clarification from APM Terminals clearly suggests that Maersk Line bungled in the issue and failed to instruct the CCTL on time to hold the container. Under such circumstances, it has emerged that the mistake of Maersk Line has led to the mix up and CCTL moved the container to APM Terminals CFS as PNR movement.


Monday, January 11, 2016

DP World Chennai’s Costly Mistake Puts Importer in Trouble


 Source: http://www.portwings.in/articlesinterviews/dp-world-chennais-costly-mistake-puts-importer-in-trouble/

Chennai:
Port Wings News Network:

When the Government of India strongly vouching for steps to promote and ensure Ease of Doing Business in the country, a mistake (rather costly mistake) by a private container terminal operator operating out of Chennai Port has forced an importer to shell out about Rs 50,000 as additional charges to take delivery of his imported goods.

According to details available, a firm namely Balaji Flowers from Nilgiris regularly imports Lillium flower bulbs from Europe through Chennai Port. During the third week of December, the firm imported one reefer box of lillium bulbs from Holland.
The cargo, in a 20-ft Reefer Container, reached the DP World Chennai Container Terminal (also known as Chennai Container Terminal Limited –CCTL) in a Maersk Line Vessel MV Maersk Bentonville.
CCTL is one of the two container terminals in the Chennai Port and operated by Gulf’s major player DP World.

DP WORLD’S COSTLY MISTAKE
Since the importer decided to take delivery of the said container from Chennai Port itself, Balaji Flowers’ representative sent an email request to the shipping liner (Maersk Line) and asked them to hold the container for inspection and delivery from CCTL itself.
In response to the request, representative of Maersk Line intimated the importer that the Container Terminal (CCTL) has been instructed to hold the reefer box in the terminal for delivery after paying Special Service Request (SSR) charges.
However, giving scant regard to the liner’s directive, the DP World Chennai authorities moved the said container to APM Terminals CFS as a PNR movement without giving any information to the importer.

IMPORTER FORCED TO PAY MORE
With the reefer box moved to a CFS from the Port limit, the importer was forced to pay about Rs 44,000 as additional cost to release the cargo.

COLLUSION BETWEEN APM TERMINALS & DP WORLD CHENNAI
According to an importer, who wished anonymity, both the APM Terminals CFS and DP World Chennai Terminals are the culprits in the particular case.
“When the liner (Maersk Line) instructed the Container Terminal (DP World Chennai) to hold the said container at the terminal for delivery, on what basis they moved the reefer box to APM Terminals CFS is remains a mystery. The act clearly suggests that both the Terminal and CFS are hand-in-glove to extract extra charges through any possible means from importers,” he added.
According to the importer, had the container delivered to him from the terminal as instructed by the liner, he would have saved Rs 44,000, charged by the APM Terminals CFS.

REVENUE THROUGH UNLAWFUL MEANS
The importer also deplored that the illegal movement of the box from container terminal to APM Terminals CFS raises suspicion that terminal is colluding with the CFS to increase its revenue through unlawful means.
Sources in Chennai Port also alleged that the container terminal (CCTL), in collusion with most of the CFSes in the Chennai Customs Zone limit, always move huge numbers of containers under the guise of “enbloc movement” to CFS and force the importers to pay more for deliveries.

APPEAL TO THE PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE
The importers also appealed to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) to identify and break such unholy nexus between different middle-level players like terminals and CFSs that are plaguing the business environment in the interest of healthy EXIM Trade.

NO REACTION FROM EITHER APM TERMINALS OR DP WORLD CHENNAI

When Port Wings sought reactions from the APM Terminals and DP World Chennai (CCTL) about the complaint of the importer, no one was available for comment.